Friday, November 19, 2010
Thursday, November 18, 2010
[Blog 3] The spanish me...
|  | |
| Spain Sabira estudia las ciencias sociales. Ella tiene muchas clases. Su clase de espanol es a los lunes y los miercoles a las diez de la manana. Ella clase de ingles es a los lunes y los miercoles a las cuatro de la tarde. Su clase de psicologia es a los jueves a las once y media de la manana. Su clase de sociologia es a los viernes a las diez de la manana. Durante la semana, Sabira estudios en la bibloteca a las nueve de la manana. Sabira va al gimnasio al mediodia los lunes y los viernes. A las nueve de la noche ella mira television de lunes a miercoles. Finalmente, Sabira va a la discoteca las sabados a las nueve de la noche. Anilu estudia las artes. Anilu tiene pintura espaneol, escultura, anthropolohea, y aleman. Anilu tiene pintura las lunes y en jueves a las ocho y media de la manana. Ella tinne espaneol los martes al mediodia. Tambien tienne escultura a las cinco menos cuatro de la tarde. Ella tiene anthropolohea los viernes a last tres y cuatro de la tarde. Anilu va la gimnasio a la discoteca, a la libereria a la leer.  | 
[Blog-2] My trip to the court...
Accused: Balwinder Badden 
Plaintiff: Wife, Son
Place of Trial or Hearing: Provincial Court of  BC
Date of Trial and Hearing: August 9, 2010
Courtroom number and name of the Judge: 107, Judge Jardine
Level of court: Provincial Court
Summary of Facts
-On  the date of December 13,2009 Mr. Balwinder S. Badden was arrested for  Assaulting his Son and possibly his wife. [they hadn't clarified that  yet because she wasn't cross examined yet].
-Mr.  Badden (accused) was heavily intoxicated when he came upstairs to the  living room where Mrs. Badden and their son was already present.
-Mr  & Mrs. Badden got into an argument, and in that commotion the  daughter; Ramandeep Badden came downstairs to hear her father saying  "Hit me! Hit me"
-She  saw her mother holding a shovel which the father was trying to grab  from the mothers hand, and tells her mother to go upstairs. 
-At this point, the son intervened between them, and "fell" on top of the father.
Plaintiff's (or Crown’s) Argument
-Crown was arguing that Mr. Balwinder S. Badden assaulted his son and wife.
Decision and Reasons for Decision
-Court  was adjourned to later in the day because there wasn't a second Punjabi  interpreter available to help cross examine Mrs. Badden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, I watched a portion of the trail of R. v. Badden and would like  to share my perspective on justice in our courts, and the challenges we  face in sometimes carrying out a just trial.   The trial started off with defence counsel calling a key witness  Ramandeep Badden to the witness box. The defence counsel asked her  several questions regarding the police statement she gave, and was cross  examining the information she had provided, and what information she  claimed had happened later but failed to include it in the police  statement after the incident occurred. Most of the trial consisted of  Judge Jardine correcting the defence counsels questions. It seemed as if  the intention of the Defence Counsel was to confuse the key witness  Ramandeep Badden, and asked questions in a form of "did you father think  it was snowing outside?" or "was your father trying to grab your  mother's hand or the shovel", and the Judge strictly objected to the  question format and asked the defence counsel to rephrase his question  because a witness can only talk about what occurred in a sense of what  she saw and heard and is no authority to talk about what her father was  thinking at any given time. I do believe that justice is an ongoing  process, and in todays case i do believe that Judge Jardine served  justice for Ramandeep Badden because she already appeared to be  extremely nervous and the defence counsel was trying to confuse her with  asking questions.   I believe the length of the long trials is turning into urgent problem  because it drags on the suffering of families seeing justice, and at the  same time costs them thousands of dollars as well. Just this case  against Mr. Balwinder S. Badden has been in trial since December 2009,  and even now it doesn't seem to be even close to final decision. It  seemed as if the case had already been adjourned to another day over  four times already, and the judge mentioned that Ramandeep Badden had to  go through pointless questioning almost every single time.   The only aspect of the proceedings that disappointed me was the Defence  Counsel because he seemed quite nervous even from the start, and he  continuously stepped outside his box, only to have the judge correct him  in a frustrating manner. I personally believe that he lacked  professionalism because it seemed as if he came to the court unprepared  which was only wasting courts valuable time but also frustrating the  judge but also the witness. Furthermore, i think the effectiveness and  efficiency can be obtained if the lawyers are more prepared in court  because the court was adjourned till the end of the day because there  wasn't a second punjabi interpreter available to interpret for the  accused Balwinder S. Badden. OveralI, I was pretty impressed overall  with how the judge handled the case even though i had expected the trial  to be a lot more smooth (TV effect).  
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
